Yesterday was the 60th anniversary of the dropping of the Bomb on Nagasaki. I was at the preschool yesterday. It was interesting to see how the teacher chose to try and explain that to a pack of four year olds. I think some of the kids didn't quite understand the concept of an "anniversary" and thought they were going to drop a bomb on Nagasaki that day. This thing is such a huge part of the soul of modern Japan, especially for those who actually live in Nagasaki or Hiroshima, so it was interesting to watch these little Japanese kids getting their first injection of it.
Most Japanese people, of course, tend to be of the opinion that it was wrong for us to nuke them. I tend to think that hindsight is 20/20; it's easy to say that now, maybe, but it wasn't so clear at the time. There was (and is) a lot of reason to believe that an actual invasion of Japan would have been worse all around. But, it's fallacious to say that B or C would or wouldn't have happened if A hadn't happened. All we can be sure of is what DID happen (and even that tends to get hazy).
Most Japanese people, of course, tend to be of the opinion that it was wrong for us to nuke them. I tend to think that hindsight is 20/20; it's easy to say that now, maybe, but it wasn't so clear at the time. There was (and is) a lot of reason to believe that an actual invasion of Japan would have been worse all around. But, it's fallacious to say that B or C would or wouldn't have happened if A hadn't happened. All we can be sure of is what DID happen (and even that tends to get hazy).
no subject
Date: 2005-08-10 03:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-10 05:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-10 10:48 am (UTC)I'm just saying, let's not forget. Unlike Japan when it comes to Nanking, the US doesn't pretend that Hiroshima and Nagasaki didn't happen, or wasn't "real". It's in our textbooks. It's on our national conscience.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_of_nanking
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Sino-Japanese_War#Attacks_on_civilians
no subject
Date: 2005-08-11 12:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-11 02:48 am (UTC)But still, Japan and the US came out of WWII with very different pasts behind them. If we had been responsible for 20-30 million deaths in Asia, maybe it would have smacked some pacifistic sense into us. But that's now how things turned out.
I am curious what you mean by Americans pretending that our atrocities don't/didn't happen. I don't mean this in a confrontational way, I'm just curious what you mean. Abu Ghraib? Mountain Meadows? My Lai? Slavery? Haymarket? We celebrate Columbus day a little cluelessly, but we also celebrate Martin Luther King day with quite a bit of reverence. I dunno, it's complicated.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-11 03:09 am (UTC)Until very embarrassingly recently, I didn't know that the Gulf of Tonkin was a lie.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-12 12:14 am (UTC)Guantanamo Bay is another lovely example. "Yeah, we've set it up so we can keep these prisoners without having to worry about useless international laws like the Geneva Conventions, sure, but we aren't actually doing anything BAD there! Heaven forbid the American government do something bad!" And no one seems to care, at least not enough to have any political repercussions for the people responsible.
And then there's all the shady dealings in Southeast Asia, South America, (and probably the Middle East and Africa) that the CIA et al has been involved in the last several decades, you know? Clandestine bombing campaigns, supplying arms to ruthlessly cruel dictatorships... Most Americans aren't even aware of that stuff (it's still vague to me, and most of the stuff I encountered when reading about recent Cambodian and Laotian history was new to me), and I betcha most of the really patriotic ones would deny it even happened if you told them about it. And the government likes it that way. The illusion of moral high ground is an important part of their pre-emptive war thing.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-12 12:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-11 01:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-10 03:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-11 12:58 am (UTC)